While the digital landscape for typefaces means it’s no longer necessary to create metal blocks for printing in different fonts, designers still use these terms on a regular basis.ĭefining the “font” for a specific typeface helps to ensure brand professionals can convey the unique image of a company as accurately as possible. They would need different “fonts” for italics, bold letters, and typefaces in different sizes. Printing companies cast entire sets of metal letters to make up a font. The word “font” comes from the French “fonte”, which means to “cast in metal”. The difference between a font and typeface was first established in the printing era. However, there are various “fonts” in the Times New Roman family. For instance, Times New Roman is a typeface, with a complete set of serif characters to choose from, and a consistent design ethos. In simple terms, a typeface refers to a set of design features chosen for letters and other characters, while fonts refer to the variation in a size and weight of a specific typeface.Ī font exists as part of a typeface. The font vs typeface argument isn’t as complex as it might seem. Today, we’re going to be looking at the “typefaces versus font” debate in detail to help you better identify the two. They’re terms which companies need to define to ensure they maintain a consistent brand image across a multitude of mediums and channels. However, ask a professional designer “what’s the difference between font and typeface?” and they’ll often be able to give you a full explanation of the individual meanings.īoth typefaces and fonts have an important role to play in the design world. For the layman, it’s easy to use the two terms interchangeably to refer to the style or design of a particular set of characters on a screen. The “typeface vs font” debate is something you’re likely to stumble across if you pursue a career in graphic design or branding.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |